Community Tip - Did you get called away in the middle of writing a post? Don't worry you can find your unfinished post later in the Drafts section of your profile page. X
Hi All
Is it possible to populate network trees only from InfoTables and not using a Network Entity or Things?
The code I have attempted is as follows:
Inputs: Name - STRING.
var params = {
maxItems: undefined /* NUMBER */
};
// result: INFOTABLE
var connections = Things["TestDataTable"].GetDataTableEntries(params);
var params = {
infoTableName : "InfoTable",
dataShapeName : "TestNetworkDataShape"
};
// CreateInfoTableFromDataShape(infoTableName:STRING("InfoTable"), dataShapeName:STRING):INFOTABLE(AtlasCustBooleanDS)
var networkInfoTable = Resources["InfoTableFunctions"].CreateInfoTableFromDataShape(params);
var entry;
var i = 0;
var row = new Object();
var eachRow;
row.from = undefined;
row.to = Name;
row.description = Name;
row.connectionType = "Contains";
networkInfoTable.AddRow(row);
row.from = Name;
for each(entry in connections.rows)
{
//eachRow = connections.getRow(i);
if (entry.Name == Name)
{
row.description = row.to;
row.connectionType = "Contains";
row.Name = Name;
networkInfoTable.AddRow(row);
}
i++;
}
var result = networkInfoTable;
Any feedback/sugestions would be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Ashley
Yes this is possible.
Guideline would be a table with to / from relationships where the top node is a to with "" as the from or I believe null might work as well.
I haven't tested this for a while, but it used to also be important to group together all the nodes that share the same from